Texas v. Johnson
Majority Opinion Dissenting Opinion
Claim
Reason
Evidence
Drag and drop the sentence into the correct portion of the above chart
To help you organize the information regarding the case of Texas v. Johnson, I can provide a general structure based on the typical content of the majority and dissenting opinions. However, since I don't have specific sentences to drag and drop, I'll outline what you might include in each section.
Majority Opinion
Claim: The act of burning the American flag is protected under the First Amendment as free speech.
Reason: The government cannot prohibit expression simply because it is offensive or disagreeable to some.
Evidence: The Court referenced historical context and previous rulings that emphasize the importance of protecting unpopular speech to uphold democratic values.
Dissenting Opinion
Claim: The act of burning the American flag is not protected by the First Amendment and can be restricted by the government.
Reason: The flag is a symbol of national unity and should be protected from acts that could be seen as disrespectful.
Evidence: The dissenting justices argued that the flag represents the sacrifices made for freedom and that the government has a legitimate interest in preserving the flag's status as a national symbol.
If you have specific sentences or points you would like to categorize, please provide them, and I can help you place them in the appropriate sections.