Discover Q&A generated by AI Answer Generator

Discover all public questions answered by AI Answer Generator

GPT-4o mini
Effectiveness of Target Costing vs. Traditional Costing

To analyze the effectiveness of target costing compared to traditional costing methods in achieving cost management objectives, let's evaluate the provided options:

a. Target costing is most effective in situations where variable costs are not a concern.

  • This statement is misleading. Target costing is particularly useful when variable costs are a significant concern because it focuses on reducing costs to meet a predetermined target price based on market conditions. If variable costs are not a concern, the need for target costing diminishes.

b. Both traditional costing and target costing are equally effective across all situations.

  • This statement is inaccurate. Traditional costing methods allocate overhead costs based on a predetermined rate, which may not reflect the actual consumption of resources. Target costing, on the other hand, is specifically designed to manage costs in competitive environments and is more effective in situations where market prices dictate cost structures.

c. Target costing is particularly effective when there is intense market competition and a need for cost leadership.

  • This statement is correct. Target costing is most effective in highly competitive markets where companies must manage costs tightly to maintain profitability while offering products at competitive prices. It encourages cross-functional collaboration to identify cost-saving opportunities and innovate in product design and production processes.

d. Traditional costing is more suitable in dynamic market environments with frequent cost fluctuations.

  • This statement is not entirely accurate. Traditional costing methods may struggle in dynamic environments because they do not adapt quickly to changes in costs or market conditions. Target costing is more adaptable and can help organizations respond to market pressures by focusing on cost reduction from the outset of product development.

Conclusion:

The most accurate and effective situation for target costing compared to traditional costing methods is c. Target costing is particularly effective when there is intense market competition and a need for cost leadership. This approach allows companies to align their cost structures with market demands, ensuring they remain competitive while managing costs effectively.

Created By pratima gawde With AI Answer Generator
GPT-4o mini
Comparing Life Cycle Costing and Parametric Control

To compare and contrast life cycle costing and parametric cost control, let's analyze the distinct features and applications of each approach based on the options provided:

Life Cycle Costing (LCC):

  • Definition: Life cycle costing is a method that considers all costs associated with a product or project over its entire life span, from initial development through to disposal. This includes acquisition costs, operation and maintenance costs, and end-of-life costs.
  • Application: LCC is widely used in various industries, including manufacturing, construction, and service sectors, to make informed decisions about investments and to evaluate the total cost of ownership.

Parametric Cost Control:

  • Definition: Parametric cost control involves using statistical relationships between historical data and other variables to estimate costs. It relies on parameters (like cost per unit, labor rates, etc.) to predict future costs based on established metrics.
  • Application: This method is often used in project management and manufacturing to control costs and improve budgeting accuracy by leveraging historical data and trends.

Now, let's evaluate the provided options:

a. Life cycle costing focuses on short-term costs, while parametric cost control is concerned with long-term costs.

  • Analysis: This statement is incorrect. Life cycle costing is inherently focused on long-term costs over the entire life of a product, while parametric cost control can be used for both short-term and long-term cost estimation.

b. Parametric cost control is primarily used in manufacturing, whereas life cycle costing is applicable to service industries.

  • Analysis: This statement is misleading. While parametric cost control is indeed used in manufacturing, it is also applicable in various other sectors, including construction and project management. Life cycle costing is not limited to service industries; it is relevant across multiple sectors.

c. Life cycle costing considers costs over a product's entire life, while parametric cost control relies on specific cost parameters.

  • Analysis: This statement is accurate. Life cycle costing encompasses all costs throughout the product's life cycle, while parametric cost control uses specific parameters to estimate and control costs.

d. Parametric cost control is more suitable for small businesses, whereas life cycle costing is tailored for large corporations.

  • Analysis: This statement is not entirely accurate. Both methods can be applied to businesses of any size. Parametric cost control can be beneficial for small businesses looking to manage costs effectively, while life cycle costing can also be valuable for small projects or products.

Conclusion: The most accurate comparison is found in option c, which highlights the fundamental differences between life cycle costing and parametric cost control in terms of their focus on costs over time and reliance on specific parameters.

Created By pratima gawde With AI Answer Generator
GPT-4o mini
Created By pratima gawde With AI Answer Generator
GPT-4o mini
Standard Cost per Labour Hour Calculation

To find the standard cost per labour hour, we first need to determine the total standard cost of the labour hours worked.

  1. Total Labour Cost: Rs 4800 for 300 labour hours.
  2. Variable Overhead Expenditure Variance: Rs 600 (A) indicates that the actual variable overheads were Rs 600 more than the standard variable overheads.

Let’s denote:

  • ( S ) = Standard cost per labour hour
  • ( V ) = Standard variable overhead cost per labour hour

The total actual cost can be expressed as: [ \text{Total Actual Cost} = \text{Total Labour Cost} + \text{Total Variable Overhead Cost} ]

Given that the total actual cost is Rs 4800 for 300 hours, we can express it as: [ 4800 = 300S + \text{Total Variable Overhead Cost} ]

Now, since the variable overhead expenditure variance is Rs 600 (A), we can express the total variable overhead cost as: [ \text{Total Variable Overhead Cost} = \text{Standard Variable Overhead Cost} + 600 ]

The standard variable overhead cost for 300 hours is: [ \text{Standard Variable Overhead Cost} = 300V ]

Thus, we can rewrite the total actual cost equation as: [ 4800 = 300S + (300V + 600) ]

Rearranging gives: [ 4800 = 300S + 300V + 600 ] [ 4800 - 600 = 300S + 300V ] [ 4200 = 300S + 300V ]

Dividing the entire equation by 300: [ 14 = S + V ]

This means that the sum of the standard cost per labour hour (S) and the standard variable overhead cost per labour hour (V) is Rs 14.

To find the standard cost per labour hour (S), we need to consider that the variable overheads are included in the total cost. However, we do not have enough information to separate S and V without additional data.

Given the options provided, we can assume that the standard cost per labour hour (S) is likely to be one of the options. Since we know that ( S + V = 14 ), we can check the options:

  • If ( S = 14 ), then ( V = 0 ) (not likely).
  • If ( S = 16 ), then ( V = -2 ) (not possible).
  • If ( S = 18 ), then ( V = -4 ) (not possible).
  • If ( S = 34 ), then ( V = 20 ) (not possible).

Since the only feasible option that fits the equation ( S + V = 14 ) is ( S = 14 ) with ( V = 0 ), we can conclude that the standard cost per labour hour is:

Answer: a. 14

Created By pratima gawde With AI Answer Generator
GPT-4o mini
Les merveilles à visiter au Liban

Bien sûr ! Le Liban est un pays riche en histoire, en culture et en paysages magnifiques. Voici quelques-uns des endroits les plus merveilleux et fantastiques à visiter :

  1. Beyrouth : La capitale du Liban est un mélange vibrant de culture, d'histoire et de modernité. Ne manquez pas le quartier de Gemmayzeh, le musée national de Beyrouth et la corniche.

  2. Byblos (Jbeil) : Une des plus anciennes villes du monde, Byblos est classée au patrimoine mondial de l'UNESCO. Vous y trouverez des ruines antiques, un vieux port pittoresque et une belle promenade.

  3. Baalbek : Connue pour ses impressionnants temples romains, Baalbek est un site archéologique majeur. Les temples de Jupiter et de Bacchus sont particulièrement remarquables.

  4. Les Cèdres du Liban : Situés dans la vallée de la Bekaa, ces forêts de cèdres sont emblématiques du pays. Le parc national des Cèdres de Dieu est un endroit idéal pour la randonnée et l'exploration.

  5. La vallée de Qadisha : Classée au patrimoine mondial de l'UNESCO, cette vallée est connue pour ses paysages spectaculaires et ses monastères troglodytes. C'est un lieu de paix et de beauté naturelle.

  6. Tripoli : Cette ville côtière est célèbre pour son architecture médiévale, ses souks animés et ses délicieuses pâtisseries. Le château de Saint-Gilles est un incontournable.

  7. Tannourine : Connue pour ses paysages montagneux et ses cèdres, Tannourine est un excellent endroit pour la randonnée et l'exploration de la nature.

  8. La grotte de Jeita : Cette merveille naturelle est une série

Created By BAL_5.02 FARES Ali With AI Answer Generator
GPT-4o mini
Created By BAL_5.02 FARES Ali With AI Answer Generator
GPT-4o mini
Expected Return Calculation for Portfolio K and L

To calculate the expected return of the portfolio made up of 60% in Company K and 40% in Company L, we first need to calculate the expected return for each company based on the given probabilities and returns.

Step 1: Calculate the expected return for Company K

[ E(R_K) = (0.3 \times 20%) + (0.5 \times 15%) + (0.2 \times 5%) ]

Calculating each term:

  • (0.3 \times 20% = 0.3 \times 0.20 = 0.06)
  • (0.5 \times 15% = 0.5 \times 0.15 = 0.075)
  • (0.2 \times 5% = 0.2 \times 0.05 = 0.01)

Now, summing these values:

[ E(R_K) = 0.06 + 0.075 + 0.01 = 0.145 \text{ or } 14.5% ]

Step 2: Calculate the expected return for Company L

[ E(R_L) = (0.3 \times 6%) + (0.5 \times 10%) + (0.2 \times 12%) ]

Calculating each term:

  • (0.3 \times 6% = 0.3 \times 0.06 = 0.018)
  • (0.5 \times 10% = 0.5 \times 0.10 = 0.05)
  • (0.2 \times 12% = 0.2 \times 0.12 = 0.024)

Now, summing these values:

[ E(R_L) = 0.018 + 0.05 + 0.024 = 0.092 \text{ or } 9.2% ]

Step 3: Calculate the expected return of the portfolio

The expected return of the portfolio (E(R_P)) is calculated as follows:

[ E(R_P) = (w_K \times E(R_K)) + (w_L \times E(R_L)) ]

Where:

  • (w_K = 0.6) (weight of Company K)
  • (w_L = 0.4) (weight of Company L)

Substituting the values:

[ E(R_P) = (0.6 \times 0.145) + (0.4 \times 0.092) ]

Calculating each term:

  • (0.6 \times 0.145 = 0.087)
  • (0.4 \times 0.092 = 0.0368)

Now, summing these values:

[ E(R_P) = 0.087 + 0.0368 = 0.1238 \text{ or } 12.38% ]

Conclusion

The expected return of the portfolio is 0.1238 or 12.38%.

Thus, the correct answer is:

b. 0.1238

Created By pratima gawde With AI Answer Generator